header-logo header-logo

Practice—Permission to appeal—CPR 52

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269, [2011] All ER (D) 190 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Hooper and Rimer LJJ, 16 Mar 2011

A prospective appellant who wishes to challenge the terms on which the judge grants permission to appeal should be required to apply to the appeal court for permission rather than challenging the terms.

Emma Dixon (instructed by Public Law Project) for the claimant. Clive Lewis QC and Joanne Clement (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The claimant successfully brought proceedings for judicial review against the defendant (see [2010] All ER (D) 278 (Jul)). The defendant obtained permission to appeal against that decision, on terms that, whatever the outcome of the appeal: (i) the order for costs which the judge had made in respect of the proceedings remained undisturbed; and (ii) the defendant would pay the claimant’s costs of the appeal. The defendant appealed against, or sought an application, pursuant to CPR 52.9(1(c), to vary, the terms upon which permission to appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll