header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Permission to appeal—CPR 52

R (on the application of Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269, [2011] All ER (D) 190 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Hooper and Rimer LJJ, 16 Mar 2011

A prospective appellant who wishes to challenge the terms on which the judge grants permission to appeal should be required to apply to the appeal court for permission rather than challenging the terms.

Emma Dixon (instructed by Public Law Project) for the claimant. Clive Lewis QC and Joanne Clement (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The claimant successfully brought proceedings for judicial review against the defendant (see [2010] All ER (D) 278 (Jul)). The defendant obtained permission to appeal against that decision, on terms that, whatever the outcome of the appeal: (i) the order for costs which the judge had made in respect of the proceedings remained undisturbed; and (ii) the defendant would pay the claimant’s costs of the appeal. The defendant appealed against, or sought an application, pursuant to CPR 52.9(1(c), to vary, the terms upon which permission to appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll