header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE OF ACTION—ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY

Reader and others v Molesworths Bright Clegg Solicitors (a firm) [2007] EWCA Civ 169

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Smith and Moses LJJ
2 March 2007

Where a personal injury claim brought by a claimant before his death has been discontinued after his death, a dependency claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) is not thereby extinguished.

Christopher Limb (instructed by AST Hampsons) for the claimants.
Bernard Livesey QC and George Spalton (instructed by Weightmans) for the defendant.

The proceedings arose out of the personal injury suffered in 1989 by Peter Reader, the father of the claimants. His injury was caused by the negligence of Roy Cordingly.

Reader consulted the defendant solicitors, who issued proceedings on his behalf. In December 1994, however, Reader committed suicide. On his death, his cause of action was transmitted to his estate by operation of law. He died intestate.

The defendants, not acting on instructions, wrote to Cordingly’s solicitors informing them of Reader’s death and stating that the action should be discontinued. The letter enclosed a consent form which was signed and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll