header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice and procedure—Payment into court—Principles to be applied

Lazari v London & Newcastle (Camden) Ltd [2013] EWHC 97 (TCC)

31 January 2013, Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J 

The Technology and Construction Court has set out principles to be applied in making an order for payment into court pursuant to CPR 3.1. 

Jonathan Lee (instructed by Charles Russell LLP) for the claimant. Jessica Stephens (instructed by Fladgate LLP) for the defendant. 

The defendant was the long leaseholder of a site in London NW1. It engaged consultants and contractors to design and construct a substantial number of luxury flats and social housing at the site. By agreement of September 2010, the defendant agreed to complete the construction of one of the flats and sell it to the claimant on a long lease. The claimant maintained that there was a continuing defect or problem in the form of excessive overheating of her flat. After initially denying liability, the defendant eventually initiated remedial works in or about mid-2012, followed by further work later the same year. The problem was still not resolved

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll