header-logo header-logo

15 July 2020
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Powers extended for CILEx lawyers during COVID-19 pandemic

Institute urges government to make the change permanent

The Land Registry has confirmed it will accept lasting powers of attorney certified by legal executive lawyers for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CILEx (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has called on the government to make the change permanent.

Under the Power of Attorney Act 1971, only solicitors and notaries public can certify copies of powers of attorney. However, CILEx contends that the exclusion of its members causes unnecessary delay and confusion. According to a CILEx survey of its members practising in wills and probate, the anomaly creates problems about ten times a month on average, resulting in delays for clients during a distressing time.

The research also found it had a negative effect on firms’ quality of service―75% said it caused delays―client satisfaction and fees.

One respondent said: ‘My clients do not understand why I cannot offer this service myself.

‘If I am qualified to act as a certificate provider and also to prepare the lasting power of attorney, then why am I not able to certify that a document is a true copy of an original document that I have already prepared?’

Another respondent said: ‘We can now become partners of law firms, have rights of audience in the courts, become judges, swear oaths as a Commissioner for Oaths, but we cannot certify a lasting power of attorney as a true copy of a page of the original document?’

CILEx chair Chris Bones (pictured) said: ‘We urge the government to take measures to make this a permanent arrangement.

‘Modernising practice in this way helps ensure affordable and timely access to legal services, particularly for the more than one million people especially susceptible to COVID-19. Our research shows how this outdated legislation is causing real people real problems, in an environment where concerns are already accentuated by the current pandemic.’

 

Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll