header-logo header-logo

Powerhouse

29 January 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7684_parpworth

Neil Parpworth on the matter of reforming the powers of the House of Lords

In its manifesto published prior to the 7 May 2015 General Election, the Conservative Party proposed to do a great many things if elected, including the introduction of “English votes for English laws” and the repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998. Progress has been made on both of these constitutional issues. Thus the Standing Orders of the House of Commons have been amended to provide for new legislative procedures in the case of “English-only” legislation, and the publication of a consultation paper on a British Bill of Rights is eagerly awaited. The manifesto contained no proposals, however, on House of Lords reform. Rather, it was made clear that this would not be a priority for a new Conservative government. Things have now changed as a consequence of the events which took place in the House of Lords on 26 October 2015 when their Lordships rejected the Draft Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 drafted pursuant to the Tax Credits Act 2002. The government’s defeat led to the prime

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll