header-logo header-logo

Power to the consumer?

17 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

John Bramhall & Karen Boto predict potential future trends in litigation

The Financial Services Act (the Act) was passed on 8 April 2010, and includes provisions relating to the introduction of consumer redress schemes in the financial services sector. The Act reserves the power to the Treasury to broaden the provisions to cover other industries. For the moment, the controversial proposals to allow consumers to issue collective proceedings have been dropped. It does, however, remain possible that those proposals may be reintroduced. Both consumer redress schemes and collective actions could have a significant effect on litigation, but will we really see a trend towards US-style class actions?

Consumer redress schemes

Previously the FSA had to seek authorisation from the Treasury before pursuing consumer redress schemes. Under the Act the Financial Services Authority (FSA) can on its own authority require firms to operate a consumer redress scheme where (i) it appears (to the FSA) that there may have been a “widespread or regular failure” by a firm relating to any regulated activity; and (ii) consumers have suffered loss as a result.
Under a consumer redress scheme a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll