header-logo header-logo

09 September 2026
Issue: 8176 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice , Landlord&tenant , Housing
printer mail-detail

Possession rules move online

Digitalisation of the justice system took a step forward this week as the Online Procedure Rules (OPR) came into force

The OPR will initially apply only to possession cases involving registered social landlords in England and community landlords in Wales, and will be piloted in Bradford, Caernarfon, Huddersfield and Wandsworth.

Possession cases are the first area to be governed by the OPR. However, the Civil Procedure Rules will continue to apply to possession appeals and enforcement proceedings for the time being.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘It is only the beginning of the gradual rollout of digital justice that should make resolving disputes simpler and more accessible. Technology alone, however, is not a substitute for investment in the justice system. The success of digital justice will ultimately be judged not by the technology itself, but, at the end of the day, if it helps people resolve cases fairly, efficiently and without unnecessary delay.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll