header-logo header-logo

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Portals causing stress & delay

Online court services are adding to delays and undermining access to justice, research by the Law Society has found

In a report published this week, Online court services: delivering a more efficient digital justice system, the Law Society highlighted technical issues across the damages claims, public family law and probate online portals.

Three in five solicitors responding to a survey said the portals had caused delays in court proceedings and one third reported increased costs arising as a result had been passed on to clients. Delays were experienced by three-quarters of probate, two-thirds of family public law and 46% of damages claim portal users.

More than half the probate users surveyed said the online process is taking longer than the paper-based system.

One probate practitioner said: ‘We have gone from a system that cost £45 and took two weeks to a system that costs £273 and takes 16 weeks! How is this progress?’

Half the damages claims users said the delays were affecting their clients. Some 70% of the family public law portal users reported technical errors and frequent breakdowns, and the vast majority (80%) reported lack of timeliness and technical support.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the court reform programme had enjoyed many successes, such as a high uptake of digital probate applications and more than 70% of all courtrooms being able to allow parties to join remotely.

However, the delays were ‘having a real impact on clients, especially as these portals are often used at an already challenging and difficult time.

‘The increased delays and associated uncertainty these portals have created are causing additional stress.’

The Law Society made several recommendations, including ‘a user-led design and development process involving the public, legal professionals and the advice sector’; and software to improve communication between online court systems and solicitors’ case management systems.

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll