header-logo header-logo

03 November 2021
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Poll casts doubt on commonhold reform

Leasehold practitioners have reported low interest in commonhold since the government proposed reforms in January

The proposals included the removal of ground rent and marriage value, and the establishment of a Commonhold Council to advise the government on implementation of commonhold, which allows homeowners to own the freehold of individual flats in a block or houses on an estate.

However, fewer than one in ten leasehold practitioners report an increase in general or specific enquiries about commonhold since January―suggesting either lack of interest or scepticism about the reforms coming to fruition. Only 3.6% of the practitioners had an increase in specific enquiries.

The poll was commissioned by the government and conducted among Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP) members. ALEP members work as valuers, solicitors and barristers in the leasehold sector, so their clients are among those most likely to convert to the commonhold model.

One respondent, who works as a valuer, said: ‘Many clients are individual lessees, and our experience is that even in blocks of flats as small as six it is often hard to get enough consensus to enfranchise, so to change to commonhold must be just as potentially difficult.’

Another respondent said: ‘Commonhold is probably seen as unnecessary, if similar results can be obtained by the lessees of flats purchasing the freehold of their block and extending their leases, with which the majority of flat owners are familiar.’

Moreover, the government has provided no timetable for reform, and ALEP members doubt it will come soon.

Solicitor Mark Chick, a director of ALEP, said: “98% of delegates who voted at our recent conference indicated that they thought there was no prospect of reform in the next two years―something that is perhaps not surprising, given the number of things that will need to be “fixed” to make commonhold work.’ 

Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll