header-logo header-logo

08 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Police Bill endangers travellers’ rights

Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities are at significant risk of having their human rights breached by legislation to criminalise unauthorised encampments, a Parliamentary committee has warned
In its third report into the controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, the Joint Committee on Human Rights examines Part 4 of the Bill, which relates to encampments. Part 4 introduces a criminal offence of trespass with intent to reside, along with additional police powers to seize mobile homes for up to three months where there is reasonable suspicion this offence has been committed.

The committee found the Bill would create extra burdens on public authorities dealing with people living in unauthorised encampments.

It urged the government instead to reintroduce the statutory duty on local authorities to provide sites for these communities, and to amend the bill so a criminal offence is committed only where an adequate authorised site has been made available.

It called for an amendment so that a caravan cannot be seized if it is a person’s principal home and they would have nowhere else to live. The legislation must be sufficient clear for the police to enforce its provisions, the committee said, and conditions entirely based on potential acts and potential impacts should be removed.

Committee chair Harriet Harman said: ‘This Bill takes a major step in making it a criminal offence for Gypsy, Roma and Travellers communities to be on private land without consent.’

Harman said the committee’s proposals would ensure the human rights of these communities are respected at the same times as landowners have their property rights protected.

The Bill passed its third reading this week. Attention has focused on several controversial aspects, notably extra powers for police to curb protests, including where only one person is protesting, on the basis of ‘noise’; increased powers of stop and search; and up to ten years in prison for damaging a memorial.

Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll