header-logo header-logo

11 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police

R (on the application of Laws) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2009] EWHC 3135 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 38 (Dec)

The proceedings concerned a constable who had been found for the purposes of reg H1 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 (SI 1987/257), to be disabled from performing the ordinary duties of a member of the police force. It was also found that her disability was likely to be permanent.

The court ruled that each determination of the select medical practitioner, or on appeal by the board, was to be treated as final; thus, where an injury pension had been reassessed under reg 37 of the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/932), and a decision had been made by the select medical practitioner concerning the degree of the recipient’s disablement at that date, that decision was final for all purposes, subject to the continuing duty, periodically, to reassess the pension under reg 37.

While the Metropolitan Police Association had a duty under reg 37 to carry out from time to time further reviews of a potential recipient’s injury pension, it could only revise the pension if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll