header-logo header-logo

16 July 2010
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police

R (on the application of C) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2010] EWHC 1601 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 25 (Jul)

Section 113B(4) of the Police Act 1997 required the chief officer—on meeting a request from the secretary of state, considering the issue of an enhanced criminal record certificate—to have regard to sub-para (a), which set out a relevance test, and sub-para (b), which involved the issue of proportionality, ie setting a balance between the importance and desirability of providing information on the one hand against, on the other, the degree of interference with and the likely consequences of such interference in the private life of the person to whom the information related.

The decision was expressly that of the chief officer; context was relevant; there was no presumption to be made against disclosure and nor was there a presumption to be made in favour of disclosure; the balance required by proportionality necessitated a close attention by the decision-maker to detail; relevant in striking the balance was the force of the accusations; and it was risk which the statute sought to guard against, indicated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll