header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Plugging the leaks

Charles Pigott tracks the government’s moves to close whistleblowing “loopholes”

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill will make significant changes to the protection for workers who blow the whistle. Originally planned for this month, these are now likely to be implemented in the summer, once the Bill receives royal assent.

Addressing Parkins v Sodhexo

Back in 2011, when announcing the coalition’s plans on the employment law front, Vince Cable said: “Finally, we want to close a loophole in the Public Interest Disclosure Act relating to whistleblowing. It has become apparent through case law that employees are able to blow the whistle about breaches to their own personal work contract. This is not what the legislation is designed to achieve and we are going to stop this in future.”

In order to qualify for protection a disclosure must fall within one of six categories set out in s 43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996). Cable was referring to the second category, which applies when the information disclosed tends to show “that a person has failed, is failing, or is likely to fail

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll