header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Please re-lease me

Malcolm Dowden on disputes of disclaimed leases & subtenants of part

A liquidator’s disclaimer of a lease ends the rights, interests and liabilities of the insolvent tenant in respect of the property, but statute preserves the rights and liabilities of other parties, including mortgagees and subtenants.

However, where subtenants remain in occupation, and particularly where they occupy only part of the premises covered by the disclaimed lease, the extent of their liabilities and obligations to the landlord is unclear.

The “phantom” lease

Insolvency Act 1986 s 178(4) provides that disclaimer: (i) determines, as from the date of disclaimer, the rights, interests and liabilities of the company in or in respect of the property disclaimed, but (ii)does not, except so far as is necessary for the purpose of releasing the company from any liability, affect the rights or liabilities of any other person.

Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough ([1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737) confirmed that under this deeming provision the rights and liabilities of guarantors, mortgagees and subtenants remain as though the lease had continued.

This “phantom” lease is crucial to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll