header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Please re-lease me

Malcolm Dowden on disputes of disclaimed leases & subtenants of part

A liquidator’s disclaimer of a lease ends the rights, interests and liabilities of the insolvent tenant in respect of the property, but statute preserves the rights and liabilities of other parties, including mortgagees and subtenants.

However, where subtenants remain in occupation, and particularly where they occupy only part of the premises covered by the disclaimed lease, the extent of their liabilities and obligations to the landlord is unclear.

The “phantom” lease

Insolvency Act 1986 s 178(4) provides that disclaimer: (i) determines, as from the date of disclaimer, the rights, interests and liabilities of the company in or in respect of the property disclaimed, but (ii)does not, except so far as is necessary for the purpose of releasing the company from any liability, affect the rights or liabilities of any other person.

Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough ([1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737) confirmed that under this deeming provision the rights and liabilities of guarantors, mortgagees and subtenants remain as though the lease had continued.

This “phantom” lease is crucial to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll