header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Playing for keeps

Michael Tringham reports on families—& royalties

The same-sex partner of a flamboyant television presenter and hotelier who committed suicide in 2006 has failed to oust the latter’s executors. When he took his own life, Timothy Hadcock-May’s commercial property business was at the point of financial collapse. Since then his executors have been paying the estate’s debts by allowing the properties to be repossessed or sold off.

Now the Court of Appeal has refused Torquil Mackenzie-Buist leave to pursue further his application to remove the executors, suggesting that he settle with them before spending even more on legal costs. Sir Robin Jacob said: “The question should not come before this court, because it has no prospect of success”, adding it was “as plain as a pikestaff” that the Court of Appeal had no power to oust the executors.

Mackenzie-Buist claimed the executors had no right to dispose of the property portfolio because, having contributed most of the money, he held the properties as a joint tenant in equity—although they were registered in Hadcock-May’s name. The executors argued that Mackenzie-Buist was under a “fundamental misconception” about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll