header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

PI premiums predicted to rise

Indemnity premiums escalate as firms told to expect an upturn in claims

Professional indemnity premiums are rising, amid a growing number of “potential claims” against law firms.

The Law Society last week launched a package of advice and free seminars on renewing indemnity cover in response to insurers’ pressure to raise premiums. The package includes a series of free seminars and one-to-one consultations with a broker, and a practice note.

Frank Maher, partner, Legal Risk, says the advice was helpful in that it “emphasises the need for firms to get on with it”.

“The Law Society guidance recommends that firms start thinking about insurance in May, and sending out proposal forms in June. I think that’s sound.

“It’s good in that it emphasises the need for risk management. It mentions Lexcel as a tool to help in that aim. The problem is that people sometimes see Lexcel as the start and finish, when it is really the beginning of the journey,” he says.

Solicitors have to renew their insurance on 1 October. However, many solicitors want the single renewal date to be abolished.

Maher says: “The Law Society has in the past looked at this as an issue that relates only to the cost of insurance and the need to make sure firms have got it in place.

“Cost is no longer the only issue for law firms. Last September, there was concern over AIG. What if a major insurer was to fold in the weeks leading up to the renewal date? There is a risk management issue there.

“The vast majority of firms want a flexible renewal date. We are the only profession in this country that has a fixed renewal date.”

He adds: “We are seeing a large number of potential claims in relation to conveyancing. We are not seeing the claims coming through yet but that may be because the lenders haven’t been able to sell the properties. Once we see an upturn in the property market, there may also be an upturn in claims.”

Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll