header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Tim Lawson-Cruttenden
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Persons unknown

Tim Lawson-Cruttenden examines the evolution of claims against unnamed defendants in non-land law cases

On 8 October Mrs Justice McGowan ordered injunctive relief in Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd v (1) Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and (2) Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC 3429 (QB).

The injunction is intended to protect the employees of Novartis, an international pharmaceutical company, against harassment by animal rights activists. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, whose membership is unknown and deliberately anonymous, were joined into the action using the representative mechanism under CPR 19.6. This mechanism enables unincorporated associations to be sued through a named individual. However, the making of orders against “persons unknown” was thought to be sufficiently innovative for the High Court to seek a review of this developing area of the law which has thus far had little supervision from the Court of Appeal.

The purpose of this article, in relation to the joining in as defendants of persons unknown, is to consider:

  1. the historical law up to 2003;
  2. recent developments since 2003;
  3. the effect of the Novartis decision; and
  4. the impact on representative orders under CPR 19.6.

The historical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll