header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Thomas Braithwaite
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The personal touch

nlj_7659_braithwaite

Thomas Braithwaite follows the use of personal claims in support of proprietary rights

The consequence of failing to protect property rights at the Land Registry is, of course, well known. In the language of s 29(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002): “Completion of the disposition by registration has the effect of postponing to the interest under the disposition any interest affecting the estate immediately before the disposition whose priority is not protected at the time of registration.”

The practical consequence of this provision is that following a transfer of land registrable but unregistered property rights cannot be asserted against the new landowner; and, in the absence of title to the land over which they were granted, the rights may be worthless or unenforceable against the former landowner who originally granted them.

Mistakes happen

So far, so obvious. But mistakes happen. Rights that could and should have been registered are sometimes overlooked. And where there are mistakes, there are often those who would seek take advantage of them. A purchaser of land may be acutely conscious of the existence of unregistered rights in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll