header-logo header-logo

Personal injury: A plague on our workers

Deborah Edwards reports on limitation and constructive knowledge in industrial disease claims

In two recent cases in the Court of Appeal, John Field v British Coal Corporation 2008] EWCA Civ 912, [2008] All ER (D) 417 (Jul) and White v EON and Others [2008] EWCA Civ 1463, [2008] All ER (D) 263 (Nov) the judges were required to address the issue of “constructive knowledge” under the Limitation Act 1980, s 14 as defined by the House of Lords in Adams v Bracknell Forest Borough Council [2004] All ER (D) 163 (Jun), A v Hoare and other appeals [2008] All ER (D) 251 (Jan).

In Field the claimant brought damages for noise induced hearing loss against British Coal where he had been employed between 1982 and 1995. By 1989, the claimant was provided with hearing protection. He had various occupational audiograms over the years and from March 1998 these tended to indicate there was a loss of hearing on the right side.

Claimant's history

This claimant had a history

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll