header-logo header-logo

04 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Personal injury discount rate “delay”

Personal injury lawyers have slated the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) decision to “further delay” a promised review of the discount rate.

The discount rate is used to calculate damages for future losses in personal injury claims, taking into account the income a lump sum might produce.

The justice secretary confirmed to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) last week that he will recruit a panel of experts to help him decide the next step.

However, Apil said this would “delay the process further” and accused the government of “dragging its heels”.

Three years ago, Apil brought a judicial review against the justice secretary, who told the administrative court that “his decision will be made as promptly as practicable”. The government consulted on the issue in February 2013. In July, Apil urged the justice secretary again to review the rate and warned it was prepared to start a fresh judicial review if necessary.

Apil president John Spencer says: “Injured people continue to have their damages unfairly docked by a discount rate which was set 13 years ago when the financial markets were very different.”

However, David Johnson, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (Foil), says: “The government is taking active steps towards addressing the issue of variation of the discount rate but exercising caution and care in its approach.

“It is entirely appropriate that the government should call for a detailed analysis of the realities surrounding the investment of damages awards, before it decides whether to vary the rate and, if so, how.”

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll