header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Martin Porter KC
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Personal injury: Blame the victim

Martin Porter QC comments on a ruling which will send shivers down the spines of cyclists

On a summer's evening in 2005, Robert Smith, cycled the short distance from his home to another house in Brightlingsea, Essex. Just before he reached his destination, a motorcycle ridden by Michael Finch collided with the bicycle and as a consequence Smith sustained a serious traumatic brain injury.

Judgment in Smith v Finch [2009] EWCH 53 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 158 (Jan) was handed down by Mr Justice Griffith Williams on 22 January 2009. He accepted the claimant's case that the accident happened while the claimant was close to the centre of the road preparing to turn right into the driveway of his destination and when the motorcyclist, travelling at excessive speed in the same direction, tried to overtake him on the offside. He rejected the defendant's case that the claimant had come out of a side road to the motorcyclist's left straight into his path. So far, so commonplace a resolution of a dispute over the responsibility for a road traffic accident

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll