header-logo header-logo

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Banking
printer mail-detail

Personal current accounts under scrutiny

A market study into personal current accounts has been launched by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) as part of its in-depth study into retail bank pricing announced by the OFT in March 2007.

As well as unauthorised overdraft charges, the OFT will examine whether “free banking” delivers sufficiently high levels of transparency and value for customers; and the implications for competition and consumers if there were a shift away from the widespread provision of this type of current accounts.

Rollits associate, Tom Morrison, says banks have been under the OFT’s spotlight for some time, so it was inevitable they would begin fighting back.

“If a cap is imposed on personal current account charges, many banks may decide to withdraw “free” personal banking. The OFT is keen to avoid a situation where it is accused of effectively inflicting the end of free banking on the millions of customers who do not need, and who do not wish to open, a current account which charges a monthly fee.”

Some, he says, feel the end of free banking is inevitable with a pay-as-you-bank system touted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll