header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Perilous times

Is the UK/EU approach to corporation regulation too heavy-handed? Khawar Qureshi QC reports

To understand the present approach to corporate regulation in the UK, it is necessary to appreciate the philosophical dilemma presented by the fact that a company is a creature of law, and to hold it liable under criminal law invariably involves blaming an individual or individuals whose conduct is (artificially) imputed to the company.

Hence, recent trends towards placing greater responsibility upon companies by means of legal regulation are designed to “persuade” them to develop practices and due diligence-based systems, which are aimed at making wrong-doing less likely. It is for that reason that companies may, for example, face big penalties vis-à-vis cartel behaviour or corporate manslaughter charges when it is apparent that systems were not in place, were deliberately overridden, or failed to prevent wrongdoing.

Different societies use their own methods to try to ensure that companies operate within the ambit of the rule of law. However, the use of statute to “put down markers”, combined with the activities of regulatory agencies and self regulation, is the essential combination in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll