header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008 / Jonathan Pratt
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Mediation
printer mail-detail

The perfect moment

How do parties recognise the correct time to mediate? asks Jonathan Pratt

Is there a right time to mediate? If one side refuses to mediate until shortly before trial, should that party be penalised in costs? Can mediation take place too early? These issues were considered in the recent High Court case of Nigel Witham Ltd v Smith and another [2008] EWHC 12 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 101 (Jan). The underlying dispute related to fees for the design and project management of building works at a hotel. At trial, the defendants  were awarded damages of £1,683 in respect of one of their counter-claims. This sum was dwarfed by the defendants’ claim for £123,000 in costs.

The claimant sought to persuade the court to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event by relying on the ruling of the Court of Appeal in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576, [2004] 4 All ER 920 that a party to litigation who unreasonably refuses to engage in mediation may be penalised in costs. This principle

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll