header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pensions

Sarjeant and others v Rigid Group Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1714, [2013] All ER (D) 234 (Dec)

It was an established principle that the rules of a pension scheme had to be construed in a purposive way in the sense of being given a meaning which respected the context in which the relevant rule had been drafted and the purpose it had been intended to achieve. There were no special rules of construction different from those which the courts routinely applied to all contractual documents. However, a pension scheme should be construed so to give a reasonable and practical effect to the scheme. The administration of a pension scheme fund was a complex matter and it seemed that it would be crying for the moon to expect the draftsman to have legislated exhaustively for every eventuality. It was necessary, therefore, to test competing permissible constructions of a pension scheme against the consequences they produced in practice. Technicality was to be avoided. If the consequences were impractical or over-restrictive or technical in practice, that was an indication that some other interpretation was the appropriate one.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll