header-logo header-logo

30 September 2011 / Alex Fox
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pension deficit

istock_000009413327medium_edit_4

Can the cost of correcting discrimination be too high, asks Alex Fox

The High Court has ruled that Iain Cockburn, the widower of a Warwickshire GP, is not entitled to receive a survivor’s pension at the same rate as he would have done were he a widow in the same position. The decision, made in July, was based on the high cost of correcting this discrimination; the court felt that avoiding such cost amounted to an objective and reasonable justification for not eliminating the discrimination.

Cockburn was supported in bringing this test case by the British Medical Association, which has campaigned on this issue for many years. An application for permission to appeal is pending.

Background

Cockburn is the widower of a former GP and member of the NHS pension scheme. Dr Cockburn joined the pension scheme in 1982 and remained a member (making contributions at the same rate as male members of the scheme) until she retired on the grounds of ill health in 2007. She died shortly afterwards.

As a consequence of Dr Cockburn’s death, her widower receives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll