header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Helen Mulcahy , Davina Bentley
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paying the price

web_mulcahy_bentley

What is the liability of a director who pays debts while his company is insolvent? Helen Mulcahy & Davina Bentley report

Recently, the liquidators of HLC Environmental Projects Limited (HLC) issued a claim for misfeasance against the principal director of HLC, Mr Carvalho, pursuant to s 212 Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). The liquidators claimed that Carvalho acted in breach of his duties as a director, both under common law and pursuant to ss 171(b) and 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) in relation to payments he caused HLC to make while it was insolvent.

 

Background

HLC carried on business in the waste recycling sector. In 1998, HLC became the preferred bidder to build recycling and energy centres in the UK. Two related companies, HLC Wrexham and HLC NPT, were set up and HLC was the holding company. By September 2005, administrators were appointed to HLC NPT and the HLC Wrexham project could not be completed.

Carvalho claimed that in 2008, HLC was still trading but the court in Hellard & Ors (Liquidators of HLC Environment Projects Ltd)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll