header-logo header-logo

10 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Paying for the Ombudsman

Lawyers lose right to free complaint cases

Lawyers will lose their right to two free client complaints cases per year from April, raising an extra £1.6m in fees for the Legal Ombudsman.

Annual fee income should then amount to about £1.8m, which means the levy against firms will fall slightly from £16.8m to £15.1m, according to the Ombudsman’s budget plan for 2013/14.

Currently, lawyers are allowed two free cases per year. The Ombudsman also has discretion to waive fees in cases where it is satisfied the customer service was adequate and the remedy offered was reasonable. Otherwise, a £400 fee per case is chargeable.

The rule was introduced to address concerns that small firms and those operating in contentious areas of law would generate more complaints and therefore be unfairly affected by case fees. In practice, however, only 400 firms exceeded their free allowance—fewer than expected—while the Ombudsman waived fees in more than a third of cases—more than expected.

In November, the Ombudsman argued in a consultation document that the waiver option gave small firms engaged in risky work sufficient protection. The proposal received support from firms and legal bodies.

The Ombudsman anticipates it “may receive a very significant level of demand” when it begins accepting claims management company (CMC) complaints this year, and cites the example of the Financial Ombudsman Service, which receives 1,500 claims per day about payment protection insurance, half of which involve CMCs. However, it says this is impossible to predict.

Writing in the report, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson said: “Although we have made a good start to our work, we can still improve on the speed, cost and quality of our handling of complaints.”

Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll