header-logo header-logo

Paying for the Ombudsman

10 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers lose right to free complaint cases

Lawyers will lose their right to two free client complaints cases per year from April, raising an extra £1.6m in fees for the Legal Ombudsman.

Annual fee income should then amount to about £1.8m, which means the levy against firms will fall slightly from £16.8m to £15.1m, according to the Ombudsman’s budget plan for 2013/14.

Currently, lawyers are allowed two free cases per year. The Ombudsman also has discretion to waive fees in cases where it is satisfied the customer service was adequate and the remedy offered was reasonable. Otherwise, a £400 fee per case is chargeable.

The rule was introduced to address concerns that small firms and those operating in contentious areas of law would generate more complaints and therefore be unfairly affected by case fees. In practice, however, only 400 firms exceeded their free allowance—fewer than expected—while the Ombudsman waived fees in more than a third of cases—more than expected.

In November, the Ombudsman argued in a consultation document that the waiver option gave small firms engaged in risky work sufficient protection. The proposal received support from firms and legal bodies.

The Ombudsman anticipates it “may receive a very significant level of demand” when it begins accepting claims management company (CMC) complaints this year, and cites the example of the Financial Ombudsman Service, which receives 1,500 claims per day about payment protection insurance, half of which involve CMCs. However, it says this is impossible to predict.

Writing in the report, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson said: “Although we have made a good start to our work, we can still improve on the speed, cost and quality of our handling of complaints.”

Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll