header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paying up

Do solicitors still have to pay counsel under the new code of conduct? Barbara Hewson investigates

On 1 July 2007, the new Solicitors’ Code of Conduct came into force. Ordinarily, the Bar does not take much interest in how solicitors govern themselves, but on this occasion the Bar has something to worry about. The new code has quietly dropped r 20.06, which provided: “Except in legal aid cases, solicitors are personally liable as a matter of professional conduct for the payment of counsel’s proper fees, whether or not they have been placed in funds by the client.”

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

“The Regulation Review Working Party undertook detailed research on the principles of professional conduct and decided that it was not necessary for the new Code to contain such a provision.”

It does not seem to have occurred to anyone that, by not taking account of the basis on which solicitors engage barristers in England and Wales, the new code is deficient, as it potentially places the solicitors’ branch of the legal profession and their clients at risk. It is remarkable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll