header-logo header-logo

17 January 2021
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

‘Pause’ courts to stop infections

The Law Society has proposed a two-week ‘pause’ of non-custodial Crown and magistrates’ court work, amid rising fears about the new Coronavirus variant
The Ministry of Justice, responding to a written question last week, has revealed nearly 600 confirmed COVID-19 infections were recorded among judges, jurors, staff or court users between 24 November 2020 and 11 January 2021. See the court-by-court breakdown at: bit.ly/35Kt9b5.

David Greene, the president, wrote to HM Courts and Tribunals Service and the senior presiding judge last week to outline fears about the safety of solicitors and other court users.

‘Since the third national lockdown was announced we have received a significant amount of feedback from our members expressing serious concerns about the safety of court buildings, despite assurances from HMCTS that they are Covid-secure for the new variant,’ Greene said.

‘To date we have welcomed the steps the government has taken to make court and tribunal buildings as safe as possible, however government figures showing a record daily reported 1,564 new fatalities and 47,525 new infections cannot be ignored. By its nature, unless remotely accessed, the court process throws people together in limited space.’

He called for ‘urgent action’ to safeguard court users and justice system professionals. As well as the fortnight’s pause, the Law Society called for a move to video by default in all Crown courts and magistrates’ courts.

Greene said: ‘We recognise that this conflicts with the imperative to mitigate the growing backlog of cases in the courts.

‘However, if the current situation continues, there is almost certain to be a significant loss of capacity due to court closures following outbreaks of Coronavirus, and due to staff, lawyers, judiciary and parties falling sick. We believe the measures we propose represent the least bad option for ensuring that courts can continue to operate safely.’

Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll