header-logo header-logo

09 May 2017
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Paul Kitson—Hugh James

paul_kitson2a_1

Expert PI lawyer joins firm

Paul Kitson, one of the UK’s foremost personal injury lawyers, has joined leading law firm Hugh James as a consultant. Bringing 30 years’ experience to Hugh James’s growing personal injury claimant team, Paul specialises in acting for seriously injured vulnerable road users and in particular cyclists.

With a notable career to date, Paul acted for two of the three claimants in the trilogy of cases which proceeded to the House of Lords, known collectively as Wells v Wells. One of the most important personal injury cases in the past few decades, it established that the discount rate which fixes personal injury multipliers for future losses should be linked to returns on index linked government stocks which are risk free investment vehicles.

An avid cyclist, Paul has also acted as the principal lawyer for charity Cycling UK (previously known as CTC) between 2002 and 2017. Since 2012, he has tirelessly worked to represent seriously injured vulnerable road users, particularly cyclists, who may be suffering from spinal and brain injuries, as well as amputations and fatalities, as a result of an accident. He also has expertise in sports injury litigation, particularly rugby, football, hockey and skiing.

Paul has not only lectured and written on cycling safety issues, but recently gave evidence at the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group (APPCG) Inquiry into the Cycling and the Justice System. Paul`s submissions were referred to in the APPCG report which was published on 2 May 2017. 

Stephen Webber, a partner and head of the claimant division at Hugh James, said: ‘Paul’s experience and reputation in the industry is second-to-none and we are delighted that he has joined the team as we look to further grow the business in our personal injury division.’

Paul said: ‘I was drawn to working with Hugh James because of their reputation for being a very hands-on, personal business. I am committed to helping the team grow the office in London as we develop our services and presence further.

‘As someone who commutes into the centre of London daily from Richmond, I’m particularly keen to keep safety in cycling on the agenda. There are over 640,000 cycle journeys made across London each day so the justice system must protect these vulnerable road users. I will continue pushing this as part of my agenda in helping those unfortunate enough to become seriously injured to get the redress they deserve.’

Issue: 7745 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll