header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Partnership

Boghani v Nathoo [2011] EWHC 2101 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

The terms of s 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 demonstrated the following propositions: (i) the obligations of partners to third parties continued notwithstanding the dissolution of the partnership; (ii) in England, if not in Scotland, the satisfaction of those obligations by performance, release or novation or the payment of damages would not usually involve reliance on the terms of s 38; (iii) s 38 did not entitle the surviving partners to engage in new bargains or contracts so as to bind a deceased former partner; (iv) even in relation to transactions, not being new bargains or contracts, begun but unfinished at the time of dissolution s 38 applied only if and to the extent that the completion of such transactions was necessary to wind up the affairs of the partnership; and (v) s 38, if applicable, conferred a power; it did not impose any additional duty.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll