header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

The partner pension conundrum

Roderick Ramage explains the formula

PA 2008 s 3(2) + ERA 1996 s 43A = AE 4 Ps where: PA = Pensions Act, ERA = Employment Rights Act, AE = automatic enrolment into a pension scheme; and Ps = partners. The catalyst for this article is Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP and another [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] 3 All ER 225. Partnerships as employers must enrol jobholders automatically into pension schemes under the Pensions Act 2008 (PA 2008), s 3(2), but partners themselves might be liable to be enrolled automatically.

A jobholder is a worker, defined in PA 2008, s 88(3) as “an individual who has entered into or works under (a) a contract of employment, or (b) any other contract by which the individual undertakes to do work or perform services personally for another party to the contract”, but by sub-s (4) this does not apply “if the status of the other party is by virtue of the contract that of a client or customer of a profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual concerned”. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll