header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

The partner pension conundrum

Roderick Ramage explains the formula

PA 2008 s 3(2) + ERA 1996 s 43A = AE 4 Ps where: PA = Pensions Act, ERA = Employment Rights Act, AE = automatic enrolment into a pension scheme; and Ps = partners. The catalyst for this article is Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP and another [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] 3 All ER 225. Partnerships as employers must enrol jobholders automatically into pension schemes under the Pensions Act 2008 (PA 2008), s 3(2), but partners themselves might be liable to be enrolled automatically.

A jobholder is a worker, defined in PA 2008, s 88(3) as “an individual who has entered into or works under (a) a contract of employment, or (b) any other contract by which the individual undertakes to do work or perform services personally for another party to the contract”, but by sub-s (4) this does not apply “if the status of the other party is by virtue of the contract that of a client or customer of a profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual concerned”. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll