header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Parting shots

Robert Hines explores the thorny issue of pre-marital agreements & a foreign national’s right to apply for financial relief

The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Traversa v Freddi [2011] All ER (D) 289 (Feb) EWCA Civ 81, and, in doing so, granted an Italian waiter, whose wife had obtained a separation order and divorce in Italy, permission to apply for financial relief in the courts of England and Wales under Part III of the Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1984 (Part III).

Facts

The parties, Traversa (the husband) and Freddi (the wife), are Italian nationals who were married in Italy on 14 November 1987. The wife was from an affluent family based in Northern Italy, whereas the husband came from a modest background in the Calabrian region of Southern Italy.
Before the marriage, the parties agreed to enter into a pre-marital agreement in which they elected for separation of goods regime should the marriage breakdown. 

Following the marriage, the parties divided their time between Italy and England where they invested in a number of restaurant businesses (which were largely unsuccessful). The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll