header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Part 36 gets a makeover

The new look Part 36, due to come into force on 6 April, addresses some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice, a QC has said.

Ed Pepperall QC, a commercial silk at St Philips Chambers and a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) which drew up the new Part 36, provides “an insider’s guide” to the new rules, in NLJ this week.

Part 36 is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast-track claims to billion-pound litigation, he writes, and it is important “that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose”.

The new rules offer greater clarity on split trials and the extent to which a judge may be told about an offer. Litigators will be able to make time-limited offers, and offers are less likely to be discounted for technical reasons.

Another change is that notice to make an offer more advantageous will be treated as the making of a new offer on the improved terms rather than the withdrawal of the original offer.

The new Part 36 even takes account of the notorious Mitchell case—a new rule provides that litigants whose budget has been limited to court fees can nevertheless recover 50% of their costs assessed without reference to the limitation if they make an effective Part 36 offer.

Pepperall writes: “This solution is intended to ensure that the miscreant is still punished for the default that led to the sanction while the innocent party does not have a blank cheque to turn down reasonable settlement offers.”

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll