header-logo header-logo

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Parody, but only if the judge is laughing

Lawyers have predicted a rise in copyright disputes as new rules on parody came into force this month.

From 1 October, parodies of copyright-protected work are exempt from legal action. Paul Joseph, RPC partner, said: “Creative works that make the zeitgeist like Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and Breaking Bad are likely to be a hugely popular source of further parody.”

Joseph predicts an increase in disputes in the short term as content owners test the limits of “parody”. “A key requirement for a publisher to claim that the parody exception protects their use of someone else’s copyright is that the new work is funny.

This means that UK judges will be asked to decide whether new creative arts are funny. If the judge isn’t laughing, the creator of the new work may end up on the losing side of a copyright infringement case.”

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll