header-logo header-logo

Pardon me?

26 November 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
32882
Can President Trump lawfully pardon himself? Michael Zander on a very live question

Joe Biden is to be sworn in as President of the United States on Wednesday 20 January 2021. On that day, whether he graces the occasion with his presence or not, Mr Trump will become liable to criminal prosecution like any other citizen. Could he pardon himself before that fell day? The question sounds like an Alice-in-Wonderland absurdity.

The US Constitution states that the president ‘shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment’. (Art 2, s 2, cl 1). The phrase ‘offences against the United States’ means federal crimes. A pardon could therefore not affect the criminal tax fraud cases currently under investigation by Manhattan District Attorney, Cyrus Vance or civil fraud cases against President Trump currently under investigation by New York Attorney General, Letitia James.

Since no previous US president has exercised the power, the question whether a self-pardon is lawful has never yet been considered by the courts. In 1996, in a 30-page article in one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll