header-logo header-logo

03 September 2009 / David Oldham
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paperless cases

David Oldham observes how IT is increasingly used in court

In a previous article (NLJ 1 May 2009), I commented on the failure of government to provide funding for the sort of technological assistance that Lord Woolf envisaged 10 years ago for courts and judges. In this article, I consider what other sorts of IT are available which might help judges and lawyers to conduct litigation more efficiently.

I admit immediately that I am not a “techie”, and so I do not pretend to understand the technical aspects of a lot of IT. What interests me is how user-friendly it is, how easily it could be introduced, and whether realistically it might be affordable. Will it help me in my day-to-day work, and will it make the system more efficient, and reduce delay and cost?
 

In many ways, the county courts in England and Wales still operate much as they did 100 years ago. The system remains paper-based, with paper files for every case. In my previous article, I mentioned that work on an Electronic Filing and Document Management programme (EFDM) has stopped. What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll