header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / David Locke
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Over the limit?

carousel_cover

Is the criminalisation of excessive alcohol consumption during pregnancy possible, asks David Locke

The Court of Appeal is currently considering its judgment in what some seek to portray as a landmark case. It is, however, no more than another footnote in what is a philosophical, moral and legal debate of many years standing, in this jurisdiction and others.

The appeal is an attempt to secure criminal injuries compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome, as a result of alcohol consumption by the mother during pregnancy. To obtain such compensation it is necessary for the child to be classified as the victim of a crime, committed when it was a foetus. Moreover, it is necessary for the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy to constitute a criminal offence, in the particular circumstances.

The court will hand down its judgment in due course, but in the interim the supposed implications are providing fertile ground for discussion and no little misunderstanding.

The foetus as a victim

The position under the criminal law was considered comprehensively in Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 1994) . The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll