header-logo header-logo

07 October 2011 / Caroline Lonsdale
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Out of touch

Caroline Lonsdale tackles the thorny issue of contact & the difficult parent

It is a general principle of family law in this jurisdiction that a child will benefit from contact with both parents. Where a child is living with one parent, it is extremely unusual for a judge to make an order that that child should have no contact with the other parent. However, on 7 October 2010, Her Honour Judge Marshall made an order for no contact between a father and his five-year-old daughter.

 
The effect of the order was that the mother did not have to allow the child to visit, stay, or have contact with the father. Four further orders were made that day regarding the father’s communications with the mother: 
  • The father was prohibited from contacting the mother about their daughter unless the mother instigated the exchange between them.
  • The mother should keep the father informed about their daughter’s upbringing.
  • The father should not contact the child’s child-minder.
  • The father should not be allowed to make any further applications under the Children Act 1989 without leave of the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll