header-logo header-logo

07 October 2011 / Caroline Lonsdale
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Out of touch

Caroline Lonsdale tackles the thorny issue of contact & the difficult parent

It is a general principle of family law in this jurisdiction that a child will benefit from contact with both parents. Where a child is living with one parent, it is extremely unusual for a judge to make an order that that child should have no contact with the other parent. However, on 7 October 2010, Her Honour Judge Marshall made an order for no contact between a father and his five-year-old daughter.

 
The effect of the order was that the mother did not have to allow the child to visit, stay, or have contact with the father. Four further orders were made that day regarding the father’s communications with the mother: 
  • The father was prohibited from contacting the mother about their daughter unless the mother instigated the exchange between them.
  • The mother should keep the father informed about their daughter’s upbringing.
  • The father should not contact the child’s child-minder.
  • The father should not be allowed to make any further applications under the Children Act 1989 without leave of the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll