header-logo header-logo

03 April 2008 / David Allison
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail

Out of step

The government is wrong to delay cohabitation reforms, says David Allison

On 6 March the government finally announced its response to the Law Commission’s report Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. As this was outside the usual six-month period within which, by convention, the government responds to Law Commission reports we might have expected a thorough and considered response and some firm proposals for implementation. Instead what we got was a “whitewash” from a government too scared of the tabloids and the “old guard” to implement a piece of progressive legislation that is desperately needed. I don’t forget of course that this is the same government that implemented the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, arguably one of the most progressive pieces of legislation of its time. But, of course, that was under pressure from . Without that pressure it seems that this government is not willing to act.

Why do I say a “whitewash”? In her written ministerial statement Justice Minister Bridget Prentice said that the report had been carefully considered and that the government had decided to seek research

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll