header-logo header-logo

16 October 2014 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Out with the old

salon

Mark Solon outlines the new guidance for experts in civil claims

The purpose of the new guidance published by the Civil Justice Council (CJC) is to assist litigators and those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying with Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The guidance will replace the Protocol for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims 2007. There are 92 clauses in the guidance and the main areas covered are listed in the text box. It is worth reading the whole document here but here are some points to note.

The new guidance emphasises the established principles that the expert should be independent and owes his primary duty to the court and not the instructing party. Experts must provide opinions that are independent regardless of the pressure of litigation. The guidance uses the following test for independence: that the expert should express the same opinion if given the same instructions by another party but should not promote the views of the instructing party.

Proportionality

The principles of proportionality emphasised by the Jackson Reforms require experts to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll