header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Out with the old?

Court of Protection Rules—a new start, asks Malcolm Skinner

The Court of Protection Rules Committee (set up in December 2009 to undertake a review of the 2007 Rules and the practice and directions that supplemented them) reported on 29 July 2010 and its recommendations were accepted by the president of the Court of Protection. The proposals were directed at speeding up the processes and making the non-contentious cases that came before the court less time-consuming and easier to conclude.

There were five main recommendations, essentially dealing with the practice and procedure of the court. It was accepted that the setting up of the new court by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was a radical departure from the old jurisdiction arrangements where the patient’s property and affairs were dealt with by the old Court of Protection and their health and welfare by the High Court.

The divergence of practice and procedure between the courts was understandable but did not sit easily with either the transfer of the issues of both property and welfare to the new Court of Protection or the stated policy of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll