header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Mark Hoyle , Cecily Crampin
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Out with the old

Mark Hoyle & Cecily Crampin discuss multinational enforcement of new judgments on old debts

Enforcing a judgment against fraudsters can be a long litigious battle, especially when the sums involved are large, and the fraudsters have the world in which to hide their assets.

A recent decision in the Commercial Court has sharpened a sword in the enforcement armoury. Although little known, it has long been law that a judgment creditor can sue on his debt within the limitation period to produce a new, enforceable judgment. Mr Justice Teare's decision in Kuwait Oil Tanker Company SAK & another v Al Bader & others [2008] EWHC 2432 (Comm), [2008] All ER (D) 165 (Oct) has demonstrated that this method is particularly appropriate in cases of fraud, especially when enforcement is a multinational pursuit.

A history of fraud

The action in Kuwait Oil Tanker Company SAK v Al Bader has its origins in the Iran–Iraq war, and attacks by both countries on merchant shipping in the Gulf.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll