header-logo header-logo

11 November 2022 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witnesses: Out for hire?

100237
The independence of experts—can any more warnings be needed, asks Chris Pamplin
  • Covers caselaw illustrating disastrous examples where solicitors have ignored the independence of experts.

It is always frustrating when expert witness independence has to be called into question. Just when you think you’ve seen the worst transgression, another two come along.

Surely everyone knows that experts must not act as ‘hired guns’? Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 35 makes clear that an expert’s first duty is to the court, and this overrides any obligation to those who instruct or pay the expert.

Where the court directs discussions to take place between experts, neither the parties nor their legal representatives may attend, unless this has been ordered by the court or agreed by all parties and the experts. In the course of discussions, experts must give their own opinions to assist the court, and do not require the authority of the parties to sign a joint statement. The report must reflect the expert’s own opinion, and it should not be influenced by the instructing party. Neither should experts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll