header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Out of favour

rexfeatures_1187832r

The Law Society is feeling the heat, notes Jon Robins

You could almost feel sorry for the Law Society. I don’t expect many defence lawyers to share in that sentiment. It was an impossible task to steer a coherent course between the policy of a government hellbent on dismantling as much of the legal aid scheme as it can get its hands on and the interests of an impoverished, fractured and fractious section of the profession.

Strike threat

For the first time defence lawyers have managed to stop fighting among themselves for a sufficient period of time to seriously pose the threat of industrial action. Just to recap, last month the government published its response to Transforming Legal Aid which proposed a further £220m cut to the legal aid budget from the criminal budget. In April, LASPO (the Legal Aid Sentencing and Protection of Offenders Act 2012) slashed £350m off the civil budget.

Chris Grayling announced a u-turn (of sorts) and ditched plans to introduce the hugely divisive system of price competitive tendering which would have seen the total number of 1,600 firms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll