header-logo header-logo

Out of date?

07 February 2014 / Murray Heining
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_heining_0

Is the Solicitors Act 1974 still relevant, asks Murray Heining

Since the introduction of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) and the extension to persons authorised to provide legal services, I have mulled over the continued relevance of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974).

Bentine

The recent ruling in Bentine v Bentine [2013] EWHC 3098 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 02 (Nov) brought it to mind again. Proudman J had to determine whether costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded from the total of invoiced costs for the purposes of the “one-fifth rule” contained in s 70(9) of SA 1974.

This provides that if a solicitor’s bill is reduced by one fifth or more, then the solicitor will bear the costs of the assessment. If the bill is reduced by less than one-fifth or is not reduced, then they are paid by the paying party, unless there are good reasons found to depart from this rule. She ruled that costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded for the “one-fifth” rule calculation.

Ignoring the issues of contract law involved, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll