header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dante Quaglione
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Our survey says…

136482
Dante Quaglione explains the importance of impartiality & transparency in survey evidence in civil actions
  • Surveys are being used increasingly in civil litigation, particularly in class certification, antitrust, intellectual property, employment class actions and false advertising cases.
  • Pointers on how to make survey evidence robust and therefore acceptable to the court.

Surveys have been gaining prominence across a range of civil litigation actions and are being used increasingly in class certification, antitrust cases and intellectual property matters (eg trademark infringement proceedings), as well as in employment-related class actions.

They also have become common in false advertising cases, as they can provide two types of key evidence: in cases in which the advertising is literally false, surveys often provide evidence on the materiality of the claim; and in cases in which the claim is not literally false but potentially misleading, surveys can provide evidence as to consumers’ perceptions of the claims.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), a specialist tribunal with the jurisdiction to hear competition damages actions, is becoming more comfortable using survey evidence and accepts that surveys can be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll