header-logo header-logo

Opting out

15 February 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The information watchdog has missed an opportunity to overhaul guidance on privacy regulations, says Helen Hart

Since December 2003 it has been illegal for UK companies to send unsolicited marketing e-mails or faxes, or make unsolicited marketing telephone calls. However, figures from CDMS, the data management company, show that over 30% of top UK companies breach the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations).

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has taken steps to encourage, rather than compel, compliance by publishing updated guidance on the regulations (see the Guidance for Marketers on the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (the guidance)).
 

The guidance comes in two parts, on:
 marketing by electronic means; and
 the use of cookies, spyware and mobile phone location data.

The guidance concerning electronic marketing has been split down again into a section for subscribers ie the recipients of commercial e-mails, and a section for marketers. There are also new sections on viral marketing, corporate subscribers and the Telephone Preference Service (TPS),
e-mail tracking and data matching.

The guidance covers some of the questions arising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll