header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Opting out

The information watchdog has missed an opportunity to overhaul guidance on privacy regulations, says Helen Hart

Since December 2003 it has been illegal for UK companies to send unsolicited marketing e-mails or faxes, or make unsolicited marketing telephone calls. However, figures from CDMS, the data management company, show that over 30% of top UK companies breach the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations).

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has taken steps to encourage, rather than compel, compliance by publishing updated guidance on the regulations (see the Guidance for Marketers on the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (the guidance)).
 

The guidance comes in two parts, on:
 marketing by electronic means; and
 the use of cookies, spyware and mobile phone location data.

The guidance concerning electronic marketing has been split down again into a section for subscribers ie the recipients of commercial e-mails, and a section for marketers. There are also new sections on viral marketing, corporate subscribers and the Telephone Preference Service (TPS),
e-mail tracking and data matching.

The guidance covers some of the questions arising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll