header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Opening old wounds

Karen O’Sullivan considers the nuances of s 33 discretion in sex abuse cases

Too many children, often the most vulnerable in society, have been the victims of institutionalised sexual abuse at the hands of those entrusted to care for them. The law has been slow to respond and up until the 2008 landmark decision of A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] 2 All ER 1, sexual abuse was classified as a deliberate assault. As such the limitation period was six years, with no discretion for the court to extend this period. This fixed limitation period resulted in significant injustice to victims, who would often bury their experience of childhood abuse for many years. When victims of abuse eventually took legal advice they would often find their claims statute barred.

A v Hoare held that the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 applies to a personal injury claim arising from a sexual assault. As such the usual limitation period is three years from the date the cause of action accrued or the “date of knowledge” (as defined by s 14), whichever is the later.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll