header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Opening old wounds

Karen O’Sullivan considers the nuances of s 33 discretion in sex abuse cases

Too many children, often the most vulnerable in society, have been the victims of institutionalised sexual abuse at the hands of those entrusted to care for them. The law has been slow to respond and up until the 2008 landmark decision of A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] 2 All ER 1, sexual abuse was classified as a deliberate assault. As such the limitation period was six years, with no discretion for the court to extend this period. This fixed limitation period resulted in significant injustice to victims, who would often bury their experience of childhood abuse for many years. When victims of abuse eventually took legal advice they would often find their claims statute barred.

A v Hoare held that the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 applies to a personal injury claim arising from a sexual assault. As such the usual limitation period is three years from the date the cause of action accrued or the “date of knowledge” (as defined by s 14), whichever is the later.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll